I’m honestly feeling really confused by how differently low AMH seems to get interpreted depending on the doctor 😕. My AMH came back at 0.6 which immediately shifted every conversation toward diminished ovarian reserve and IVF urgency, but then my baseline scan showed an AFC of 14 which sounded much more reassuring. Now I genuinely don’t understand how clinics medically balance these two things during IVF planning because they seem to be telling completely different stories about my ovaries. Has anyone else had low AMH with a surprisingly decent AFC and how did your actual IVF response turn out later?
I had something similar and it was so confusing 😅 My AMH was low but my AFC looked decent and I didn’t know which to trust. Turns out both matter but your body can surprise you during stimulation. It was such a relief when my response was better than I expected and gave me hope for the cycle!
Honestly numbers like this would mess with my head so much 😞 If my AMH was 0.6 but my AFC was 14, I know I’d keep obsessing over which result actually reflected what my ovaries were capable of during IVF. I think one of the hardest parts of fertility treatment is realizing that even “good” looking markers don’t always translate into predictable retrieval outcomes and your body can still surprise you either way.